DOWESTON Technical & Selection Center
EN
Digital indicators and PID controllers: 50 selection, application and maintenance questions
50 shared questions for Digital indicators and PID controllers, covering selection, delivery, maintenance, common questions and evidence-based brand comparisons, with verification actions, limits and sources.
Retain your engineering references
Keep a draft in this browser, then manually import it in My library after signing in.
Accounts follow the existing registration and approval process. Saving knowledge does not automatically unlock pricing or other commercial permissions.
Shared guidance for this product family. Confirm the complete model and application; family-level guidance is not evidence of a particular product specification or approval.
General principles do not replace technical confirmation of a specific model. Verify performance, approvals and replacement against the complete order code and actual conditions.
1What does the Digital indicators and PID controllers principle establish, and what does it not establish?
A digital indicator converts and scales its configured electrical input; a PID-capable model additionally calculates a control output from error. Indication, alarming and closed-loop control are separate functions. The principle explains signal generation; it does not establish the range, accuracy, materials or approvals of every model. Review the physical principle and the application limits separately.
Verification: Confirm "Input type: current, voltage, RTD or thermocouple and exact characteristic" and assess "Display resolution is not input accuracy; scaling cannot improve sensor performance" against the actual application. Record the complete model and document revision used.
Application boundary:Display resolution is not input accuracy; scaling cannot improve sensor performance
2Is the required result measured directly or calculated from other inputs?
Define the quantity to be accepted before selecting a display unit. A digital indicator converts and scales its configured electrical input; a PID-capable model additionally calculates a control output from error. Indication, alarming and closed-loop control are separate functions. For "Input type: current, voltage, RTD or thermocouple and exact characteristic", document output definitions and conversion or compensation conditions; displaying a value does not make it a direct measurement under all conditions.
Verification: Document the process objective, units and reference conditions. Check "Treating additional decimal places as higher accuracy" and list separate inputs and acceptance methods for calculated results.
Application boundary:Treating additional decimal places as higher accuracy
3Which application information is needed before requesting a quotation?
Prepare at least these five input groups: Input type: current, voltage, RTD or thermocouple and exact characteristic; Engineering range, units and decimal-point meaning; Required alarm and output actions on sensor failure; Actuator type, control direction and permitted output limits; Process time constant, sampling period and power environment. Mark unknown items for confirmation instead of substituting a normal point or an assumed default for all conditions.
Verification: Have process, instrumentation and purchasing roles agree the inputs, particularly "Engineering range, units and decimal-point meaning". Resolve missing evidence before requesting application confirmation.
Application boundary:Display resolution is not input accuracy; scaling cannot improve sensor performance
4How should the range be chosen rather than copied from a nominal equipment rating?
Select the range from actual operating conditions and permissible error, then check extremes and installation constraints. For this family: Display resolution is not input accuracy; scaling cannot improve sensor performance Nominal size or maximum equipment rating need not equal the useful measuring interval.
Verification: List minimum, normal, maximum and abnormal conditions. Check "Required alarm and output actions on sensor failure" against the documented performance envelope.
Application boundary:Display resolution is not input accuracy; scaling cannot improve sensor performance
5Can a larger turndown claim or display rescaling fix poor low-end performance?
No. Low-end usability depends on the principle, available signal and error mechanisms. PID sampling must suit the process and actuator saturation affects integral action More display digits, software scaling or a stated turndown cannot remove the original noise or installation error.
Verification: Obtain error definitions and limits at the actual low operating point. Use "Proportional bias: check scaling, units and transmitter range" to investigate bias instead of comparing only percent-of-full-scale values.
Application boundary:PID sampling must suit the process and actuator saturation affects integral action
6How should compatibility with the measured object and materials be established?
Use the complete measured object and actual exposure, rather than a material name alone. Actuator type, control direction and permitted output limits Avoid this family-specific misuse: Connecting an actuator without checking output type For non-wetted equipment, assess loads, target materials, signals and environmental compatibility instead.
Verification: List the actual contact or loading parts, seals, insulation and cleaning conditions. Have the responsible parties assess "Thermocouple type and cold junction or RTD wiring must match the input".
Application boundary:Thermocouple type and cold junction or RTD wiring must match the input
7Why must abnormal and environmental conditions be listed separately from normal operation?
Normal measurement, temporary excursions and survival limits are different requirements. Thermocouple type and cold junction or RTD wiring must match the input Start-up, cleaning, impacts, power interruption or abnormal environments can determine the necessary construction and protection.
Verification: Complete the worst-case conditions using "Process time constant, sampling period and power environment" and check "Ordinary alarm or PID output is not automatically an independent safety protection". Separate continuous operating limits from temporary limits in the specification.
Application boundary:Ordinary alarm or PID output is not automatically an independent safety protection
8Can the published instrument accuracy be used as the installed system accuracy?
Not without assessment. Use a traceable simulator of the correct input type at relevant points; validate PID performance on the controlled process separately from electrical calibration. The installed system also includes object, mounting, signal conversion, environmental and reference effects. Derived results additionally depend on the relevant input uncertainties.
Verification: Agree actual test points, installation conditions and the acceptance reference. Check "Check terminals by input type and keep powered signals out of resistance inputs" and document the system error or uncertainty basis.
Application boundary:PID sampling must suit the process and actuator saturation affects integral action
9How should response time, filtering and a stable display be balanced?
A stable indication and fast change detection involve a trade-off; filtering cannot repair incorrect installation or real process variation. Sustained cycling: check direction, tuning, sampling and actuator hysteresis Review the complete chain when fast response matters, not merely the display refresh rate.
Verification: Define the shortest relevant event and acceptable delay. Check "Verify input scaling and control direction before entering automatic control" and verify local output, display and receiving-system response using a controlled change.
Application boundary:Masking control-direction or sensor errors with excessive filtering
10Which typical applications fit, and which require a specific engineering review?
Typical contexts include: Local process indication; Heating or cooling loop control; Data indication with limit alarms. Similar application labels do not establish equivalent conditions. In particular, assess "Ordinary alarm or PID output is not automatically an independent safety protection" before relying on another installation as proof.
Verification: Select the nearest application and compare "Input type: current, voltage, RTD or thermocouple and exact characteristic" and "Process time constant, sampling period and power environment". Obtain written confirmation where published application limits are exceeded.
Application boundary:Ordinary alarm or PID output is not automatically an independent safety protection
11How should a complete order code be defined without unspecified standard options?
Translate required functions, performance and physical interfaces into verifiable options. Input type, range, wiring and compensation; Panel cutout, supply and terminal protection. Options affecting suitability or supply scope should be explicit; terms such as standard or same as existing are insufficient.
Verification: Check the complete order code and selection sheet, especially "Required alarm and output actions on sensor failure". List accessories, documents, calibration and delivery boundaries separately.
Application boundary:Treating additional decimal places as higher accuracy
12Which mounting and mechanical layout checks belong before ordering?
Check terminals by input type and keep powered signals out of resistance inputs The installation drawing must match the available space and process or mechanical structure. Access for fitting and servicing should be established before delivery.
Verification: Review a dimensioned, oriented site drawing. Use "Actuator type, control direction and permitted output limits" and "Thermocouple type and cold junction or RTD wiring must match the input" to confirm connections, support, removal access and safe isolation.
Application boundary:Thermocouple type and cold junction or RTD wiring must match the input
13How can supporting infrastructure prevent an instrument that fits but cannot be used?
Separate power and low-level signal wiring and follow grounding instructions Supporting conditions are part of the measurement system. Matching mechanical connections or signal names alone do not establish power, I/O, grounding or configuration compatibility.
Verification: Confirm "Electrical properties of analogue, relay or logic outputs" and "Control direction, manual/auto tracking and limiting" against actual terminals, loops and receiving-system settings.
Application boundary:Connecting an actuator without checking output type
14What is a sensible commissioning sequence before changing correction factors?
Check identity, installation and basic conditions first, then status, output and process response. Verify input scaling and control direction before entering automatic control Preserve original evidence for unexplained anomalies instead of concealing them with zero or factor adjustments.
Verification: Record factory settings and initial status. Investigate "Overrange indication: check input type, terminals and open circuits" step by step and change parameters only after identifying the cause and using an authorised procedure.
Application boundary:Masking control-direction or sensor errors with excessive filtering
15Do identical output units or interface names establish connection compatibility?
No. Establish the represented object and reference conditions: Input type, range, wiring and compensation. Electrical equipment also needs loop type, scaling, failure behaviour and protocol details checked. Mechanical indicators require clear boundaries between indication and remote-transmission accessories.
Verification: Check the receiving-system variable against "Input type: current, voltage, RTD or thermocouple and exact characteristic" and verify limits, units and abnormal states with the actual equipment. Record wiring, configuration and end-to-end checks against "Separate power and low-level signal wiring and follow grounding instructions".
Application boundary:Connecting an actuator without checking output type
16What should a calibration report contain to be relevant to the application?
Use a traceable simulator of the correct input type at relevant points; validate PID performance on the controlled process separately from electrical calibration. The report should identify the delivered instrument, measured quantity, conditions, method and results. A general conformity certificate does not establish performance for every option or operating condition.
Verification: Check serial number, points, units, reference equipment and traceability. Compare "Engineering range, units and decimal-point meaning" with the calibrated conditions and agree separate acceptance where they differ.
Application boundary:PID sampling must suit the process and actuator saturation affects integral action
17How can delivery and site acceptance use reproducible pass criteria?
Check input and indication with a traceable source and test outputs and alarms separately Agree criteria before testing, including range, conditions, error definition and treatment of anomalies. Similar-looking readings or an unsuitable portable reference are not sufficient acceptance evidence.
Verification: Choose an appropriate reference using "Use a traceable simulator of the correct input type at relevant points; validate PID performance on the controlled process separately from electrical calibration.". Record "Input type: current, voltage, RTD or thermocouple and exact characteristic" and test conditions; investigate "Proportional bias: check scaling, units and transmitter range" before deciding on rework or recalibration.
Application boundary:PID sampling must suit the process and actuator saturation affects integral action
18What belongs in the quotation and agreement for a non-standard application?
Define why the standard supply is insufficient, the required verification and the responsible parties. Ordinary alarm or PID output is not automatically an independent safety protection; Replacing independent limit protection with one ordinary PID loop. Additional materials, construction, documents or tests depend on actual requirements.
Verification: Attach "Process time constant, sampling period and power environment" and the deviations. Obtain technical confirmation, additional charges, delivery conditions and acceptance methods; unknown requirements must not be assumed satisfied.
Application boundary:Ordinary alarm or PID output is not automatically an independent safety protection
19Where should investigation start when there is no valid reading or output?
Overrange indication: check input type, terminals and open circuits Distinguish the actual measured condition from device-state and readout or transmission faults. Do not immediately interpret missing data as sensor failure or a zero process value.
Verification: Under appropriate safe isolation, check "Separate power and low-level signal wiring and follow grounding instructions". Compare local and receiving-end status and record when the fault appeared.
Application boundary:Treating additional decimal places as higher accuracy
20How can unstable readings be separated from genuine process variation?
Sustained cycling: check direction, tuning, sampling and actuator hysteresis Compare independent process evidence and raw signals before deciding whether installation, interference or equipment is responsible. More filtering can hide a real abnormal event.
Verification: Keep conditions comparable and record correlation with process or equipment events. Check "Check terminals by input type and keep powered signals out of resistance inputs" and change one factor at a time.
Application boundary:Masking control-direction or sensor errors with excessive filtering
21How should a persistent high or low bias be investigated before changing factors?
Proportional bias: check scaling, units and transmitter range Systematic bias can arise from units, reference conditions, configuration, installation or the reference method. An unexplained correction can move one operating-point error to other conditions.
Verification: Align quantities, time bases and units first. Review the reference using "Use a traceable simulator of the correct input type at relevant points; validate PID performance on the controlled process separately from electrical calibration." and confirm that "Engineering range, units and decimal-point meaning" matches the configuration.
Application boundary:PID sampling must suit the process and actuator saturation affects integral action
22When is it appropriate to adjust a drifting zero or reference position?
Manual/auto bump: inspect integral state, tracking and output limits Establish a genuine, stable reference condition that meets the method requirements before considering adjustment. Some instruments have no freely adjustable site zero.
Verification: Check "Verify input scaling and control direction before entering automatic control" and "Use a traceable simulator of the correct input type at relevant points; validate PID performance on the controlled process separately from electrical calibration." and retain before-and-after results. If the conditions cannot be established, remove external effects or use a qualified service.
Application boundary:Masking control-direction or sensor errors with excessive filtering
23Which evidence helps diagnose intermittent alarms or failures?
Correct output without response: check actuator power, wiring and mechanical sticking Intermittent faults need correlated event records, not just a normal display after recovery. Review alarm settings, communication status and actual process abnormalities separately.
Verification: Retain time, status codes, raw trends and the contemporaneous "Process time constant, sampling period and power environment". Compare "Separate power and low-level signal wiring and follow grounding instructions" and "Verify input scaling and control direction before entering automatic control" to locate the failing link.
Application boundary:Replacing independent limit protection with one ordinary PID loop
24Why should repeated failures trigger a cause review instead of another identical replacement?
Repeated failures warrant a common-cause assessment. Replacing independent limit protection with one ordinary PID loop If the external conditions remain unchanged, an identical construction or installation can experience the same failure again.
Verification: Summarise failed parts, service time and "Process time constant, sampling period and power environment". Check "Check terminals by input type and keep powered signals out of resistance inputs" and "Thermocouple type and cold junction or RTD wiring must match the input" and establish corrective action before selecting repair or redesign.
Application boundary:Thermocouple type and cold junction or RTD wiring must match the input
25What distinguishes a site comparison, an adjustment and a calibration?
Use a traceable simulator of the correct input type at relevant points; validate PID performance on the controlled process separately from electrical calibration. A comparison identifies differences; adjustment changes indication or parameters; calibration establishes a reference relationship under stated conditions. They are not interchangeable claims.
Verification: Define what performance and evidence must be established, using conditions relevant to "Engineering range, units and decimal-point meaning". Retain original and adjusted results, references and responsibility records.
Application boundary:PID sampling must suit the process and actuator saturation affects integral action
26What must be checked again after replacing an instrument with the same basic model?
The same basic model does not establish identical options, software, calibration or accessories. Control direction, manual/auto tracking and limiting; Alarm independence and required valid safety documentation. Previous system operation does not remove the need to verify a replacement.
Verification: Compare full order codes and revisions. Recheck critical points, failure states and interfaces using "Check input and indication with a traceable source and test outputs and alarms separately" before handover.
Application boundary:Replacing independent limit protection with one ordinary PID loop
27Can every published maximum rating be achieved simultaneously?
No. Display resolution is not input accuracy; scaling cannot improve sensor performance Maximum values usually relate to particular options and conditions. Temperature, load, pressure, materials, speed or signal conditions may constrain one another.
Verification: Review "Required alarm and output actions on sensor failure" and "Process time constant, sampling period and power environment" together. Obtain confirmation for the combined conditions instead of assembling unrelated maxima from separate pages.
Application boundary:Display resolution is not input accuracy; scaling cannot improve sensor performance
28Does a missing signal or zero indication establish that the process value is zero?
No. Overrange indication: check input type, terminals and open circuits Indication, measurement and transmission have distinct possible failure modes. Also consider "Treating additional decimal places as higher accuracy"; establish the actual process condition independently.
Verification: Check available status or failure indications and "Electrical properties of analogue, relay or logic outputs". For interlocks, follow the complete safety design rather than substituting a zero value for diagnosis.
Application boundary:Treating additional decimal places as higher accuracy
29Does one acceptable test point establish compliance across the working range?
No. Use a traceable simulator of the correct input type at relevant points; validate PID performance on the controlled process separately from electrical calibration. Test points and directions must reflect the working interval, relevant error mechanisms and acceptance purpose. Multiple points, reversal or load tests depend on the method.
Verification: Define acceptance coverage against "Engineering range, units and decimal-point meaning" and include critical operating points. Mark conditions outside the tests as unverified.
Application boundary:PID sampling must suit the process and actuator saturation affects integral action
30Are the largest range, highest accuracy class and most options always preferable?
Not necessarily. Options should serve the required objective; excess configuration can add cost, complexity or incompatibility. PID sampling must suit the process and actuator saturation affects integral action; Connecting an actuator without checking output type. Establish essential requirements before comparing optional benefits.
Verification: Document the objective in "Input type: current, voltage, RTD or thermocouple and exact characteristic" and why "Input type, range, wiring and compensation" is needed. Compare performance at actual working points rather than one headline metric.
Application boundary:PID sampling must suit the process and actuator saturation affects integral action
31Can every maintenance or recalibration interval simply be fixed at one year?
Not independently of risk and history. Use a traceable simulator of the correct input type at relevant points; validate PID performance on the controlled process separately from electrical calibration. Intervals depend on applicable law or contract, conditions, drift, maintenance and failure evidence. Generic advice cannot replace mandatory requirements.
Verification: Use "Manual/auto bump: inspect integral state, tracking and output limits" and "Replacing independent limit protection with one ordinary PID loop" to establish and review an initial plan. Retain the justification and approval for interval changes.
Application boundary:Replacing independent limit protection with one ordinary PID loop
32Can parts from different brands be mixed if their physical interfaces fit?
Physical fit is insufficient. Panel cutout, supply and terminal protection; Electrical properties of analogue, relay or logic outputs. Matching, materials, signals, calibration and approval boundaries can change with the combination.
Verification: Check the complete combination against "Separate power and low-level signal wiring and follow grounding instructions" and obtain compatibility and acceptance evidence. An unconfirmed assembly must not be described as an approved system.
Application boundary:Connecting an actuator without checking output type
33Does a hazardous-area, hygienic or safety label establish suitability for that duty?
Check the exact order configuration and valid documents rather than a series name. Alarm independence and required valid safety documentation "Ordinary alarm or PID output is not automatically an independent safety protection" also matters; certificates, installation conditions and restrictions together define suitability.
Verification: Obtain certificate identifiers, covered models and special conditions and match them to the site. Similar names do not grant functional-safety or legal-metrology approval.
Application boundary:Ordinary alarm or PID output is not automatically an independent safety protection
34What evidence makes the final result acceptable, reproducible and sustainable?
Establish the chain from quantity definition and application limits through configuration, mounting, reference and operating status. Check input and indication with a traceable source and test outputs and alarms separately A normal indication or brochure alone cannot demonstrate continuing system reliability.
Verification: Put "Input type: current, voltage, RTD or thermocouple and exact characteristic", "Use a traceable simulator of the correct input type at relevant points; validate PID performance on the controlled process separately from electrical calibration." and "Correct output without response: check actuator power, wiring and mechanical sticking" into the technical, acceptance and maintenance records, with responsibility for reviewing excursions.
Application boundary:Ordinary alarm or PID output is not automatically an independent safety protection
35Can a DOWESTON model replace an installed instrument from another brand?
Possibly, after a full configuration and application comparison. A basic model name or matching output is not proof of equivalent replacement. Input type, range, wiring and compensation; Panel cutout, supply and terminal protection; Electrical properties of analogue, relay or logic outputs. Record conclusions on material differences.
Verification: Provide the original full order code, data sheet and site conditions. Check "Control direction, manual/auto tracking and limiting" and "Alarm independence and required valid safety documentation" and obtain the necessary test and approval evidence before replacement.
Application boundary:Ordinary alarm or PID output is not automatically an independent safety protection
36Why choose DOWESTON, and what would make that reasoning evidence-based?
Base the decision on project compliance and documented delivery or service, rather than a slogan. "Input type: current, voltage, RTD or thermocouple and exact characteristic" and "Display resolution is not input accuracy; scaling cannot improve sensor performance" are important family-specific checks. Claim only benefits supported by the offered product documents and written commitments.
Verification: Request the proposed configuration matching "Input type, range, wiring and compensation", test evidence and delivery/service terms. Do not infer unverified performance, approvals, origin or service life.
Application boundary:Display resolution is not input accuracy; scaling cannot improve sensor performance
37How can competing brands be compared beyond a single accuracy or price figure?
Use identical conditions and supply boundaries. Input type, range, wiring and compensation; Electrical properties of analogue, relay or logic outputs; Alarm independence and required valid safety documentation. Quotes with different ranges, compensation, accessories or calibration scope can conceal material differences.
Verification: Compare "Engineering range, units and decimal-point meaning", "PID sampling must suit the process and actuator saturation affects integral action" and mounting/acceptance conditions. Separate demonstrated, unverified and inapplicable items; do not claim unproven overall superiority.
Application boundary:PID sampling must suit the process and actuator saturation affects integral action
38How should purchasing compare cost without overlooking additions or rework?
Compare complete supply and use-cycle costs, not only the main instrument price. Check terminals by input type and keep powered signals out of resistance inputs; Use a traceable simulator of the correct input type at relevant points; validate PID performance on the controlled process separately from electrical calibration. List the actual installation, supporting equipment, calibration, consumables, downtime and service requirements without assuming any brand is always cheaper.
Verification: Use the same "Input type, range, wiring and compensation" configuration and "Process time constant, sampling period and power environment" boundary. Separate equipment, accessories, commissioning and maintenance responsibilities and retain a traceable comparison.
Application boundary:Ordinary alarm or PID output is not automatically an independent safety protection
39Can a 4–20 mA input be displayed in any engineering unit?
Scaling is possible only with a defined transfer relationship. Current alone has no engineering unit; nonlinear conversion needs an appropriate function, not merely a new label.
Verification: Check both endpoints and an intermediate point against the transmitter range.
Application boundary:Display resolution is not input accuracy; scaling cannot improve sensor performance
40Why can copper extension wiring cause thermocouple errors?
Thermocouple voltage depends on temperatures and conductor materials. Added copper junctions can alter the reference conditions; cold-junction compensation has defined limits.
Verification: Check extension type, polarity and actual junction temperatures.
Application boundary:PID sampling must suit the process and actuator saturation affects integral action
41What happens when PID control direction is wrong?
An incorrect direction can drive the actuator to increase the error, creating positive feedback and output saturation. Lower gain does not correct the sign.
Verification: Use a permitted small manual step to confirm the direction of the process response.
Application boundary:Thermocouple type and cold junction or RTD wiring must match the input
42Why can integral windup delay recovery?
While an actuator is saturated, an unmanaged integral term can accumulate and delay recovery. Review output limits, anti-windup and tracking behaviour.
Verification: Record output and error through saturation and inspect the model’s integral handling.
Application boundary:Ordinary alarm or PID output is not automatically an independent safety protection
43How can output bumps be reduced during manual-to-auto transfer?
Check integral tracking, setpoint tracking and the conditions for bumpless transfer. A manual/auto button alone does not prove that the transition is bumpless.
Verification: Record setpoint, process value and output across a controlled transfer.
Application boundary:Display resolution is not input accuracy; scaling cannot improve sensor performance
44Can a relay output regulate power like a continuous analogue output?
A mechanical relay normally provides on/off or time-proportioned action, constrained by contact life and switching rate; analogue or solid-state outputs need different interfaces.
Verification: Check load type, contact ratings and the permitted control cycle.
Application boundary:PID sampling must suit the process and actuator saturation affects integral action
45Why can an actuator cycle while the display appears stable?
Display filtering and internal control processing may differ. Inspect noise, deadband, resolution and actuator hysteresis rather than assuming a steady display means a steady loop.
Verification: Compare raw input, output trend and actual actuator position.
Application boundary:Thermocouple type and cold junction or RTD wiring must match the input
46When does square-root indication have a physical basis?
Square-root extraction is justified only by a verified square-law relationship and correct input reference. It is not a universal conversion for flow or pressure signals.
Verification: Check whether extraction already occurs upstream to avoid applying it twice.
Application boundary:Ordinary alarm or PID output is not automatically an independent safety protection
47Do alarm hysteresis and delay solve the same problem?
Hysteresis defines separate switching and reset levels; delay defines persistence time. They address different effects and either can postpone a genuine alarm when excessive.
Verification: Record trip level, reset level and persistence criteria separately.
Application boundary:Display resolution is not input accuracy; scaling cannot improve sensor performance
48Can a broken-sensor alarm detect every temperature sensor fault?
No. Shorts, drift, intermittent contacts or loss of thermal contact can still produce plausible inputs. Open-circuit detection is only one diagnostic function.
Verification: Test open circuit and other credible faults using an approved procedure.
Application boundary:PID sampling must suit the process and actuator saturation affects integral action
49Why may auto-tuning not remain suitable after a batch change?
Tuning reflects the dynamics and operating point during the test. Load, material, heat transfer or actuator changes can alter the process response.
Verification: Retain tuning conditions and verify overshoot, settling and limits at representative loads.
Application boundary:Thermocouple type and cold junction or RTD wiring must match the input
50Why can an accurate indicator still be part of an inaccurate temperature system?
Electrical input tests cover only part of the chain. Immersion, conduction, wiring, cold junctions and the actual thermal field can contribute temperature error.
Verification: Document electrical simulation and installed temperature comparison separately.
Application boundary:Ordinary alarm or PID output is not automatically an independent safety protection
